‘Our long-term objective is to make printing a subscription’ says HP CEO gunning for 2024’s Worst Person of the Year award | Not satisfied with merely bricking printers, HP now wants to own them al…::It was only the other day we reported how HP has been slapped with a lawsuit in response to measures that disable its printers when fitted with a third-party ink cartridge. Now the company’s CEO,

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because of basically ALL printer manufacturers. I know people like Brother printers, generally, but why pay something like $60-100 for a printer when you only need to use one a few times a year?

    For me the cost savings are pretty huge.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The big difference is convenience. I’ve got an inexpensive Brother laser printer. It is probably 12 years old now and is as good as the day I bought it. I’ve only replaced the toner cartridge once or twice. I set it up on my home server so it’s available on all of our family devices (well, not the phones). When the kids wake up in the morning and suddenly realize they have to print off their homework for school, it’s no problem at all.

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        At least in the Netherlands, there’s a bunch of places you can print including your own school for free.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I go out of my way to eliminate paper wherever possible, so I would rather spend $100 to be able to do something digitally than $50 for a printer.