• hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know enough about Roman politics to contradict but “any civilisation really” is definitely too broad of a stroke.

      • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. But it only really becomes a problem in very large communities. A chieftain overseeing 50-100 villagers isn’t as easily corrupted.

        • bob_lemon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At that point, the scale is just different. That’s when the brother of the chief gets to build his new hut on the nice hill.

          • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, that’s the mildest form of corruption I can imagine.

            But do you really think a village has zoning laws in the first place?

            At that scale, it’s also much easier to just remove the chief’s son from his hut on the “nice hill”. And the chief along with him. Scale being the key factor is the essence of my argument.