I do not think blockchain would solve any funding issues. Its more so about the information and it’s validity in a decentralized network. I realize blockchain is almost exclusively associated with cryptocoins, but it seems like there should be other use cases for the technology. It would be cool to have a centralized ledger of CVEs where the information is agreed upon by partners; be it various vendors, governments, and institutions.

I am definitely not a blockchain expert, or even a novice. I’m probably closer to the people that don’t know how the regular web works. With the rise of de-centralized/federated social media an communications, I’d think people would be interested in a similar framework for something like the CVE database. I’m not say blockchain is the answer for this issue either, it was just an idea. An idea that people are not big fans of apparently, and that’s fine. I think a different commenter mentioned using git, so there’s another idea.

Regardless of the method, I see de-centralization as a benefit and hopefully other do as well.

oh no.

You asked me “Do you think they won’t need funding on the blockchain?” No, I don’t think that.

I do think they need funding.

what, that I do not think that?

what are you trying to argue?

That works too, but who controls the servers, and how is the authority handled? Backing up the data is one thing, and that can be easily done I believe. But what about for future advisories? They are published via one of the authoritative servers and synced to the other authoritative servers? How is that information verified to ensure bad actors aren’t publishing bullshit information?

I don’t think blockchain is necessarily the answer. The whole thing can just be done with signing keys, yeah?

I know everyone hates on blockchain, but I think its kinda neat and would like to see some cool applications with it one day.

No

can they put cve on a blockchain? or some publicly auditable distributed database?

its worrisome that all it takes is a funding cut to shut it down.

that was always my beef with ads, they just didnt speak to me on an emotional level

if thats true, brb setting up a website and a bot farm

Aurora, its fedora kinoite (atomic w/ KDE) with some extra desktop stuff and regular flathub flatpaks.

they should call it dugg.com

its icetown all over again!

what kinda 2009 headline is this?

police also confiscated 50 pairs of counterfit ray-ban sunglasses and 20 lbs of zippo lighters

probably never. i mean, Facebook and tiktok are still around.

meh

from one monoplatform to another? OK cool, what could go wrong?

because why wouldn’t they?

sounds like you do your own research

but for real, who is still using x? i thought it was just a bunch of mouth breather magas at this point.

Haha, you’re not wrong about it seeming a little extra to get installed.

I used coreos live ISO and coreos-installer with the ignition file produced from a ucore-autorebase.butane file. I lightly edited the example butane file with the ssh keys I wanted to use, password hash, and “ucore-minimal:stable-nvidia” since I’ve got an old 1060 gpu in the server for jellyfin.

proxmox is awesome, but i dont think its a right fit for what you’re looking to do. if you just want to run a few podman containers, I’d probably go with a server os that is geared towards containers.

check out fedora’s coreOS or maybe ucore from the universal blue project. it seems like they’re both good candidates for podman. i think opensuse has a similar offering in microOS.

i recently migrated containers from an older Ubuntu server running docker to a ucore server with mainly rootless podman containers. i think I prefer ucore as updates are automated, reboots are scheduled for off hours, and the podman containers are kept updated by systemd service. and cockpit comes on the os image container, so i can poke stuff on a webpage too I guess.