Calling defeat before even trying is not only not grounded by facts - it’s playing right into their hands (their = data exchange companies and nodes in that network)
Calling defeat before even trying is not only not grounded by facts - it’s playing right into their hands (their = data exchange companies and nodes in that network)
Two Tesla owners walk into a bar. One stops in the middle on the way to the aeat and the other one drives right into a fire truck
That’s some serious spam if it managed to get there too
Articles about this will continue to be posted until moral improves
You don’t have to drive all the way to the actual place
Can you call on wifi? Yes (voip numbers like you said). I think that’s a phone.
Obviously you need to be connected
If you want to hear the “why” part, that’s the 16m
Added a TLDW summary to the post if you want to take a peek
A flame of xylophone?
Actually good point, added a TLDW screenshot of the summary
Well technically there is: pixel + graphene os + airplane mode with wifi only, from the video
Some have tactile markings for location reference, like keyboars have
And lots of craft beer
I thought for a sec it was significant
If we can just get it to fail completely that’d be great, if that’ll make him a non billionaire
In X’s EU user base report consisting of data from February to July 2023, Musk’s social media platform had 112.2 million monthly active users in the EU. In the following six month period from August 2023 to January 2024, that number dropped to 111.4 million users.
That’s a minuscule drop % wise
Even when AI is given search results it can struggle with anything that’s not simple. Kagi has a search integration and it references the websites, even then I often find mistakes, although much less without it.
I don’t trust LLMs without this integration
No you don’t understand, this one will say it respects your privacy
Publication: https://drive.usercontent.google.com/download?id=1MZrFRii_nJYdW8RulORB9JveLkCRbncX&export=download&authuser=0
Couldn’t get a translation in place sp asked an AI to answer what is the researchers definition of self harm: According to the report, the researchers define self-harm content as material that shows, encourages and/or romanticizes self-harm. This includes content that:
The self-harm content was categorized into 4 levels of increasing severity:
So their definition covers a spectrum from text references to self-harm all the way to explicit visual depictions of serious self-harm acts involving blood. The categories represent an increasing degree of overtness in the self-harm content. [1]
↩︎