The “tank” has an immobile or mostly immobile turret, depending on the particular design of this piece of battlefield ingenuity. Units appear to be making these modifications at the frontline to improve survivability against FPV drones but there isn’t a standard package.

Pay them for a public ipv4.

There absolutely was. Intel got smacked on the wrist for doing their benchmarks using ICC… you know, the compiler that builds code that detects that it’s not running on an Intel CPU and disables all optimisations and extended instruction sets (like say MMX/SSE).

You can never trust it for long term archival / to stay intact for a long period though.

It’s saying that incognito mode doesn’t prevent people on the web from tracking you, that’s all.

I.e. enabling incognito mode could still have an entity profile you, etc. like your ISP, government, or any corporation that you visit the website for.

This is a nothingburger.

Counter point: I don’t want an untraceable phone used as a detonator. There’s a reason that these things are linked to real-world identities.

Huh, sounds like PRIME render offload with the serial numbers filed off.

Someone doesn’t understand how casettes work!

Hint: the reels need to be driven.

It may or may not work, unfortunately.

I successfully ran 2x32GB in a Dell XPS 15 that “didn’t support” it, because the larger DIMMs didn’t exist at the time it was designed and documentation was done up.

It’s not going to hurt to try, but if you have two DIMM slots it’s worth a shot; the slots are already wired up to address lines! Maybe try with one first?

Edit: the CPU specs say that it supports 64GB and only up to two memory channels. It’s looking pretty good on that end.

Here’s a point in favour:

https://signal.org/blog/cellebrite-vulnerabilities/

It will make no difference to the performance of a VPN; nothing that those nodes are doing is IO bound.

Even if you own your own servers you still need somewhere to host them; ISPs / colocation providers are going to have the same issues with abuse.

PXE is automagic being basically kind of hacky extension to DHCP stuff.

If PXE is enabled the machine will automatically find it via a DHCP relay on the network.

the boot image supplying server being in the same intranet as the rest of the other servers … Since the first mode is probably too unsafe, that leaves us with the second mode.

Why do you think that’s unsafe?

BareOS is a great open source option. The GUI is a webUI but you also have a powerful console on the shell if you need to script.

Outside of amd64 desktops it kind of does.

I have a multi-WAN configuration on my router, with ipv6 VDSL then ipv4 VDSL then a prepaid 4G modem as the backup link. I rarely fail over but it’s been fantastic watching traffic stats when it does.

My only downside is the CGNAT on that connection that prevents things like a backup VPN gateway…

That doesn’t say anything about watch unlock

Simply refuting the BS claim that it’s impossible for there to be a Linux virus.

This one existed, therefore the claim is false.

There are still no viruses for Linux … because it’s not possible.

Here is just one example that proves your assertion wrong.

https://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/slapper.shtml

There are no viruses for Linux.

Blatant lies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware