• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    My theory is that the Mission Impssible franchise is about to wrap, and Tom Cruise is going to calm down on the stunt work, now that hes getting older. I cant blame him for that.

    So they can’t count on him to continue doing big stunts in the future, so they better give it to him now. So he’ll be nominated for the final MI movie, and he will win. And frankly, he deserves it, for his amazing body of stunt work.

    • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I remember readng articles MI:Dubai. Didnt think much of it. Camerawork and editing makes it look cool and such.

      Then I watched the movie. Even on the small screen, I was on the edge of my seat.

      Am willing to give up my kidney to watch that movie in IMAX.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        I really think Tom Cruise is a weird and creepy guy, but i can’t help it, his movies are nearly always great. I’ll watch anything he does, and at least 9 times out of 10, I’m blown away.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I would agree except employment is so fickle in the biz. Health insurance should come through the Academy, since everyone is always a member even when they don’t have a gig

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Why would the academy have anything to do with labour relations at all? It’s the literal anthithesis of its foundation.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          They do, (thanks, Arrkk) and that’s a better answer.

          But the schoolmarm in me brings me back to tell you that, because of the “y-” in the way “union” is pronounced, standard usage is “a union” even though it starts with a vowel. The reason we use “an” is to avoid an awkward slide from the a to the vowel, but in words that start with the “you-” sound it’s not necessary.

          A ugly bastard An ugly bastard

          A onion An onion

          An unicorn A unicorn

          That’s me done, and a gold star to you on catching my original error!

  • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    My favourite Tom Cruise roll is A Few Good Men. But even then I cant think of another stunt perfomer than Tom Cruise.

    If/When he retires, who is next?

  • funkajunk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Give one to that panda for doing all those crazy kung fu moves

    Masterpiece

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      That’s not a panda, that’s Jack Black in a panda costume and he won’t need more awards after he wins all the Oscars for saying “chicken jockey”.

  • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Oh dear.

    The stunt arms race is officially on. That means bigger stunts, more danger, and more people getting hurt to chase the big shiny prize they just created.

    The safe and humane way forward here was better digital effects. This change will literally mame and kill people who didn’t have to get hurt.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      This has always been the argument against having an oscar for stunts, but its hard to imagine that stunts could get much more dangerous that they already are.

      Most stunt pros want to protect themselves from death even more than their defenders. They plan these stunts extensively and train hard for them. They do their best to leave nothing to chance. Yet they still take it to the edge, often, and they’ve been doing it since the beginning of film. Its highly doubtful they could even get more dangerous that those old Buster Keaton stunts, or the car chase scene in Death Proof, or many of Tom Cruise’s stunts in the Mission Impossible franchise, etc. We can all name 100 jaw-dropping stunts.

      Getting killed or maimed is not likely to get you the Oscar, so I don’t think its a valid reason to not have a category for Stunts.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      You have clearly never seen Order of the Black Eagle where a man gets his face run over as a stunt gone wrong. It’s low budget and they weren’t trying.

      Idiots will hurt themselves doing stunts for cheap too without the prestige. The “Big” stunts are actually usually safer as they have more people knowing what they are doing.

      Maybe we can just still give them the awards for putting their bodies on the line anyways for film making a thing that isn’t going to stop.